k

k

پیام های کوتاه
  • ۲۸ تیر ۹۲ , ۱۴:۰۵
    %)
آخرین مطالب
  • ۹۵/۰۵/۱۷
    kkk
آخرین نظرات
  • ۵ دی ۹۴، ۱۱:۲۸ - سعید
    مرسی

۱۵۷ مطلب با موضوع «مسیر زندگی من :: Money :: Knowledge, Skills, Expertise :: Languages :: ارشد :: اصول و مبانی نظری ترجمه» ثبت شده است

Translation shifts
In Section A of this unit, we looked at the concept of translation shift and at
some of the taxonomies that have been proposed for describing the changes that
occur in a specific ST–TT pair. The readings in this section are from perhaps the
most noted theorists in this area:J ohn Catford, who was the first to use the term
‘translation shift’ in his A Linguistic Theory of Translation, published in 1965; and
Jean Vinay and Jean-Paul Darbelnet, whose A Comparative Stylistics of French
and English (1958/1995) still remains the most comprehensive categorization of
differences between a pair of languages. The extract from Catford (Text B4.1),
describes the two kinds of translation shifts in his model: level shifts (between the
levels of grammar and lexis) and category shifts (unbounded and rank-bounded


Task B4.1.1
➤ Before you read Text B4.1, look back at Section A, Unit 4 and make sure you
are familiar with the term translation shift.
➤ What would you say would be the aim of translation shift analysis?
➤ What were some of the problems with shift analysis discussed at the end of
Section A of this unit? Do you agree that these really are problems?
➤ As you read the text below, make a list of examples of the different kinds
of shifts described by Catford. Note the difference between level shifts and
category shifts).









Holmes
mapped out the new field like a science, dividing it into ‘pure’ Translation Studies
(encompassing descriptive studies of existing translations and general and partial
translation theories) and ‘applied’ studies (covering translator training, translator
aids and translation criticism, amongst others). More priority is afforded to the
‘pure’ side, the objectives ofwhich Holmes considers to be twofold (1988:71):
1. to describe the phenomena of translating and translation(s) as they manifest
themselves in the world of our experience, and
2. to establish general principles by means of which these phenomena can be
explained and predicted.
Here Holmes uses ‘translating’ for the process and ‘translation’ for the product. The
descriptions and generalized principles envisaged were much reinforced by Gideon
Toury in his Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond (1995) where two tentative
general ‘laws’ of translation are proposed
: